So, what does Moses have to do with Rothschild? I am glad you asked.

I believe in the supernatural. I am convinced that there were giants and that while they are no longer giants, a race of people has remained on earth that still has the remnants of angel DNA. These people are the elite and the super wealthy of the world…

Mayer Amschel Rothschild wrote of his efforts to strengthen the family bloodline. It is interesting to note that, of the 18 marriages made by his grandchildren 16 were between first cousins. Today, the world is run by seven extended families which always, and without fail, intermarry. This includes the families of every President of the United States. President Obama’s mother was in the family. She was a cousin of George Washington and George Bush. You cannot find an international banker or a CEO of a major international company who is not related to these families. The Presidents of every Ivy League University in the world, are related to these families. You cannot get away from them, they rule the world.

Mayor Rothschild was a Jew. Strange habit of European Royalty; every Monarch in Europe had a “Court Jew.” It was mandatory. This came from Daniel, who was a wise advisor to the King of Babylon. It followed, apparently, through every civilized nation that ever followed. Every King had to have a Jew to advise him on important decisions. These Jews became wealthy and powerful. Mayor Rothschild was a Court Jew who used his power to amass an untold fortune. That fortune now controls the world. The Rothschilds and their extended family, now hold controlling interest in the Central Banks in all but two or three nations in the world. They control the Fed in Washington DC and its counterparts in Beijing and Moscow.

Every President of the United States, save one, has been related to the British Monarchy and to each other. No one outside of the family has ever won the Presidency. Obama may look black but he is a cousin of Abraham Lincoln, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. All of them are related to King John, the villain in the Robin Hood legend. It is a family affair.

The Rothschilds are the undisputed leaders of world government, but we really should, at this point, go back and talk about the family of Moses, the Bible hero and receiver of the Law. It is here that the truth will offend the would-be Jews who are among us… That, I cannot avoid. So, what does Moses have to do with Rothschild?  I am glad you asked.

Numbers 31: 7 They waged war against Midian, as the Lord had commanded Moses, and killed every male. 8 Along with the others slain by them, they killed the Midianite kings—Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba, the five kings of Midian. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword. 9 The Israelites took the Midianite women and their children captive, and they plundered all their cattle, flocks, and property. 10 Then they burned all the cities where the Midianites lived, as well as all their encampments, 11 and took away all the spoils of war and the captives, both man and beast. 12 They brought the prisoners, animals, and spoils of war to Moses, Eleazar the priest, and the Israelite community at the camp on the plains of Moab by the Jordan across from Jericho.

13 Moses, Eleazar the priest, and all the leaders of the community went to meet them outside the camp. 14 But Moses became furious with the officers, the commanders of thousands and commanders of hundreds, who were returning from the military campaign. 15 “Have you let every female live?” he asked them. 16 “Yet they are the ones who, at Balaam’s advice, incited the Israelites to unfaithfulness against the Lord in the Peor incident, so that the plague came against the Lord’s community. 17 So now, kill all the male children and kill every woman who has had sexual relations with a man, 18 but keep alive for yourselves all the young females who have not had sexual relations.

Zipporah, the wife of Moses, was a Midianite, although Numbers 12:1 calls her “a Cushite woman”. Cush was the eldest son of Ham and Kush is a Hebrew word for African. More than the incident at Peor, the Midianites, as were the other tribes in the land, were of mixed blood, intermarried with the sons of the Nephilim and the Gibborum. There were giants among the people of Midian.

God ordered the Israelites to kill every man woman and child in the tribe of Midian. This was not cruel, they carried the deadly strain of hybrid DNA which threatened to pervert the bloodline of Abraham and prevent the birth of the Messiah. Saving the virgin girls alive most likely lead to the unholy mixing of DNA. God destroyed the tribes living in the Promised Land for the same reason He sent the Flood.

Moses, was already married to a Midianite, and many, including myself, believe that it is the children of Moses and Zipporah whose blood now flows throw the veins of the Rothschilds and the seven families identified as “Blue Blood.”

Jesus spoke often of separating the tares from the wheat, the chaff from the grain and other illustrations of a final, earthly, separation. The church has taken this as separating the saved from the unsaved, but Jesus was talking to Jews. It is within the realm of possibility that he was talking about separating all of mankind… removing the unredeemable, those with the deadly DNA, from among us.

Is it possible that there are two races of men, dwelling together on this planet and that it is a mixed and perverted race, blood relatives of the fallen angels, who rule the world and the nation in the name of Lucifer?



No Jew, in the first century, would have doubted that the “Sons of God” in Genesis 6, were angelic, supernatural beings…

Genesis 6:1 (HCSB) When mankind began to multiply on the earth and daughters were born to them, 2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of mankind were beautiful, and they took any they chose as wives for themselves. 3 And the Lord said, “My Spirit will not remain with mankind forever, because they are corrupt. Their days will be 120 years.” 4 The Nephilim were on the earth both in those days and afterward, when the sons of God came to the daughters of mankind, who bore children to them. They were the powerful men of old, the famous men.

Enoch 6:1 (Charles) And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto them beautiful and comely daughters. 2. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: ‘Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men and beget us children.’ 3. And Semjâzâ, who was their leader, said unto them: ‘I fear ye will not indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.’ 4. And they all answered him and said: ‘Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.’ 5. Then sware they all together and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 6. And they were in all two hundred; who descended ⌈in the days⌉ of Jared on the summit of Mount Hermon, and they called it Mount Hermon, because they had sworn and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. 

The Book of Enoch or First Enoch, if you prefer, belongs to the Second Temple Period in Israel. (516 BC – 70 AD) No one knows who wrote it, but Scripture quotes it, and in that context, calls Enoch a Prophet. It is imagined that at least the first part of the book was based on lost manuscripts and oral traditions that predate the flood. We know, and can demonstrate, that the Jews of the Second Temple Period, including the writers of the New Testament, were knowledgeable of and greatly influenced by the book.

The writers of the New Testament held a supernatural world view. Their understanding of Angels and demons was very much in line with the Book of Enoch. They understood that while the fallen angels were locked up until the judgment day, demons were, in fact, the disembodied spirits of the Nephilim and the Gibborum.  This was the generally held view of the Jews alive at the time of Jesus. The Angels, mentioned in Enoch, had produced offspring with human women. How that is possible is beyond the scope of this blog post but Scripture equates their sin with the sin of Sodom and Gomorrah, obviously labeling it as sexual in nature.

The Nephilim were the children of the Angels and human women. The Gibborum, or giants, were the genetic descendants of the Nephilim, sometimes Gibborum / Gibborum, but often Gibborum / human. They got smaller as the Nephilim blood got weaker and more diluted over the generations. These mixed blood tribes were still in the Promised Land when Joshua took Jericho. It was the Gibborum who so frightened the Hebrew spies that they refused to enter the Land. It was these mixed tribes that God ordered the Jews to decimate, killing every man, woman, boy and girl. God was not cruel; these people were unredeemable and posed a threat to the bloodline of the coming Messiah.

The Jews of the Second Temple Period, understood that the souls of these mixed, human / angel beings, could not die. Enoch informed them that these souls had been condemned to wander the earth until the Judgment. These souls hungered and thirsted, having human appetites but were unable to meet their needs without a body. It was for this reason that they sought to possess human beings. These souls were the demons who so plagued mankind with disease and gross evil.

In the mind of the Second Temple Period Jews, these demons were much more responsible for the evil and fallen condition of man than was even the fall of Adam and Eve. Adam and Eve had lost the dominion over the earth to Satan and brought on a curse. It was the fallen Angels and their progeny who had taught every evil, from seduction to the art of war, to mankind. It was the Nephilim who had made mankind so evil that God had destroyed the earth in the flood and it was the demons, the spirits of the Nephilim and the Gibborum who continued to bring sickness and influence men towards evil.

No Jew, in the first century, would have doubted that the “Sons of God” in Genesis 6, were angelic, supernatural beings. That view held, in the Church, until Augustine. It was Augustine who was the first to question the supernatural aspects of Scripture and it was he, who first introduced the idea that the “Sons of God” in genesis 6 were the very human descendants of Seth, while the “Daughters of men” were the evil daughters of Cain. I will discuss the obvious fallacies in that theory in another post. Let me simply say that the idea that the “Godly” sons of Seth, forcing themselves on the ungodly daughters of Cain, reverses the picture, making rapists out of the Godly men and victims out of the “evil women.” Beyond that, the idea that the union between two very human groups produced giants, is inexplicable. The only reason for believing the so called “Sethite Theory” is a steadfast refusal to believe in the supernatural.

So, Enoch effected the beliefs of the writers of the New Testament. It is quoted by both Peter and Jude and alluded to by others. It explains and opens our understanding of Scripture, both Old and New Testaments. Our Canon was settled on in the West and those who made those decisions had good reasons for doing so. The oldest Scriptural Canon in the World is the Ethiopian Canon. While Enoch is excluded in the canon accepted by Catholics and Protestants in the West, it is included in the older canon. Is it Scripture? Certain Eastern and African churches accept it as Scripture, while we do not. Some things evade dogmatic statements. I will leave that decision to my readers.

This author, believes in the supernatural. I am convinced that there were giants and that while they are no longer giants, a race of people has remained on earth that still has the remnants of angel DNA. These people are the elite and the super wealthy of the world… You can argue with me if you like; I certainly cannot prove that. We can discuss that in a future post.

Three books for those whose interest is peaked. Each of the three books has extensive bibliographies which point to literally hundreds of other books. Several people have earned ThDs and PhDs, studying these things. There is room for a hundred more dissertations on the subject. I encourage study.

  1. The Unseen Realm: Michael S. Heiser
  2. Reversing Hermon: Dr. Michael S. Heiser
  3. The Great Inception: Derek P. Gilbert

Follow up posts will be based on your questions and comments… Thoughtfulness and courtesy are appreciated.




I could care less who goes to church on what day, or what they eat…

Ephesians 2: 11 So then, remember that at one time you were Gentiles in the flesh—called “the uncircumcised” by those called “the circumcised,” which is done in the flesh by human hands. 12 At that time you were without the Messiah, excluded from the citizenship of Israel, and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world.

To whom was the Law given? Was the Law of Moses given to the Amorites or the Hittites? No, the Law was given to the sons of Abraham. We were, “Gentiles in the flesh… excluded from the citizenship of Israel, and foreigners to the covenants of the promise, without hope and without God in the world.”

We were never under the Law.

The only way for a Gentile Christian to come under the Law is to voluntarily step out from under grace and intentionally submit to the Law.

Galatians 5:4 You who are trying to be justified by the law are alienated from Christ; you have fallen from grace.

Jewish Christians have been rescued from the Law. Gentile Christians never were under the Law.

To refuse grace and place yourself in bondage, under the Law, is to insult the cross of Jesus Christ!

Romans 6:14 For sin will not rule over you, because you are not under law but under grace.

It is a very simple statement:

“You are not under the law.”

  • It is simple English and it is translated from a very simple, straightforward statement in the Greek.
  • There is no question about what the words mean.
  • There are no alternate “possible translations” that might possibly give reason to believe that those words do not mean what they say.
  • A third grader could tell you what that statement means.
  • If you were in this country on a diplomatic visa, and they arrested you, you could rightly tell the judge that you were not under that law. They might deport you but they could not imprison you. The Laws of the United States cannot be applied to those here with diplomatic visas.
  • Possession of a Bible carries the death penalty in North Korea. That does not frighten me. I am not under the Laws of North Korea and I walk freely with my Bible in hand.

No one misunderstands that verse but millions reject that verse.

  • They reject that verse because they believe that they are special because obeying a couple of those laws has made them special.
  • If that verse is true, going to church on the Sabbath has no merit and abstaining from pork earns no Celestial Brownie Points.
  • If that verse is true, those who abstain from pork and go to church on Saturday are no better than those who eat pork and go to church on Sunday.
  • That idea is unacceptable, and so they reject plain Scripture and submit to a law that holds no real power over them.
  • They trade grace for a ministry of condemnation and death.

It is very, very difficult to let go of legalism. To trade in the opportunity to earn your own righteousness and the sense of self-satisfaction you get from that, for a theology that says, “Jesus paid it all, all to him I owe,” is almost impossible. It literally destroys the ego. It hurts like Hell…

We are not under the Law.:

  • We are in Jesus.
  • Jesus told us to Love God and to love our neighbor.
  • That I am glad to do.
  • If you love God and your neighbor,
  • you will not have idols
  • or dishonor your parents
  • or murder
  • or steal
  • or commit adultery
  • or covet.

At the same time, Christ becomes your Sabbath Rest and you trade in the Sabbath Day for a 24/7 relationship. You give thanks for pork and lobster and shellfish and you consecrate them through prayer and thanksgiving.

Romans 6:14 says, “For sin will not rule over you, because you are not under law but under grace.”

Either that is true or God is a liar. Your call.

Galatians 5:18 says, “But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law.”

Either that is true or God is a liar. Your Call.

Galatians 5:4 says, “You who are trying to be justified by the law are alienated from Christ; you have fallen from grace.”

Either that is true or God is a liar. Your Call.

2 Corinthians 3 says. “7 But if the MINISTRY OF DEATH, IN LETTERS ENGRAVED ON STONES, came with glory, so that the sons of Israel could not look intently at the face of Moses because of the glory of his face, fading as it was, 8 how will the ministry of the Spirit fail to be even more with glory? 9 For if THE MINISTRY OF CONDEMNATION has glory, much more does the ministry of righteousness abound in glory.”

Either the Ten Commandments are a ministry of death and condemnation, or God is a liar. Your call.

I had a man who claims to be “Torah Observant” comment: 

“you seem to confuse the Torrah (sic) with the Talmud. Where in the Torrah (sic) does it say I must not touch a chair that my wife has sat on during her period.”

This is what drives me nuts… people who self-identify as “Torah Observant” and / or “Law Keepers” generally have no idea whatsoever what the Torah teaches…

Leviticus 15:19 “‘When a woman has her regular flow of blood, the impurity of her monthly period will last seven days, and anyone who touches her will be unclean till evening.

20 “‘Anything she lies on during her period will be unclean, and anything she sits on will be unclean. 21

>>>Anyone who touches her bed will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 22

>>>Anyone who touches anything she sits on will be unclean; they must wash their clothes and bathe with water, and they will be unclean till evening. 23

>>>Whether it is the bed or anything she was sitting on, when anyone touches it, they will be unclean till evening.

When I posted that Scripture, there was dead silence. He never replied.

I am not fighting the Law.

  • The Law is forever.
  • The Laws of Kazakhstan are very real, they just do not apply.
  • The Law of Moses is very real, it just does not apply.
  • “We are NOT under the Law but under Grace.”
  • I repeat, “We are NOT under the Law but under Grace.”
  • What does the Scripture say?
  • Romans 6:15 What then? Should we sin because we are not under law but under grace?
  • Absolutely not!”

If we are not under the law, how do we define sin?

  • By the Law of Christ.
  • What is the Law of Christ?
  • Love God with all your heart, mind, soul and body and your neighbor as yourself.
  • Does Adultery violate that Law?
  • Yes.
  • How about stealing, murder, gossip or sexual perversion?
  • Yes, absolutely!
  • How about eating bacon or going to church on Sunday?
  • No, no way!
  • I can love God and my neighbor while I eat Bacon before church on Sunday.
  • How about letting a gentile enter my house (The Torah forbids it)
  • No, I love my gentile neighbor too. (Not to mention that I am a gentile.)
  • How about going to church after I bury my dead dog?
  • The Torah forbids that.
  • No, that has nothing to do with loving God or my neighbor.
  • How about sleeping with my wife during her time of the month?
  • The same Torah that forbids pork, tells me I am not even to touch the chair she sat in.
  • Nope… That rule has nothing to do with loving God or my neighbor.

What gets me is the hypocrisy of the “Law Keepers” and the “Torah Observant.”

  • The same Torah that forbids pork, forbids women to go to the House of God, during their period or for seven days following.
  • That same Torah forbids a man who has touched even a chair his wife sat in during that time of month to enter a house of worship.
  • It forbids a man who had an ejaculation the night before to go to church.
  • It forbids anyone who touches a dead animal to go to church.
  • It forbids you to light any kind of fire or cook on the Sabbath.

All of these rules and hundreds more are found in the Torah, but the “Law Keepers” and the “Torah Observant” rip the dietary laws out of that Torah, insist that they are binding on Christians but that you are free to ignore every other rule in the book.

  • That is the dictionary definition of hypocrisy.
  • They insist that the Sabbath is mandatory.
  • The same Torah that says not to eat pork, contains more than one hundred laws which define exactly what one cannot do and what one must do in order to “Keep the Sabbath Holy”.
  • The Same Torah that says not to eat pork tells you how to keep the Sabbath.
  • The food laws are binding on Christians but the Sabbath laws in the same book are not?
  • What?
  • Sounds hypocritical to me…

John 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I said, Ye are gods?

Some have been looking at this verse in a discussion over whether or not we are “gods” (little g). I see something else in the verse…

Jesus refers to it as “Your Law” as opposed to “My Law” or “God’s Law…”

Jesus did not take ownership of the Law nor did He ascribe ownership to God. In the New Testament, it is called:
• The Law
• Your Law
• The Law of the Jews
• The Law of Moses
It is not called “God’s Law” and Jesus did not refer to it as “My Law.”

When Jesus spoke of his commandments, He specified:
• Love God with all your heart, mind, soul and body
• Love your neighbor as yourself

2 Corinthians 3:7-11 calls the Ten Commandments a “Ministry of condemnation” and a “Ministry of death.”

2 Corinthians 3:Now if the ministry of death, chiseled in letters on stones, came with glory, so that the Israelites were not able to look directly at Moses’ face because of the glory from his face—a fading glory— how will the ministry of the Spirit not be more glorious? For if the ministry of condemnation had glory, the ministry of righteousness overflows with even more glory. 10 In fact, what had been glorious is not glorious now by comparison because of the glory that surpasses it. 11 For if what was fading away was glorious, what endures will be even more glorious.

Speaking of the Law of Christ, Galatians 6:2 says:

“Carry one another’s burdens; in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ.”

There is world of difference between carrying another’s burden in order to fulfill the Law of Christ and abstaining from pork and going to church on the Sabbath is some sort of vain and half-hearted attempt to fulfill the Law of Moses

You may try to earn all the Celestial Brownie Points you can by going to church on Saturday and not eating pork. I am satisfied with the righteousness imparted to me in Christ Jesus.

2 Corinthians 5:21 He made the One who did not know sin to be sin for us, so that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

In Christ, I have become the very righteousness of God. I couldn’t beat that if I never ate Pork and went to Sabbath church a thousand weeks in a row…

It is those who insist that they are more holy than I because they go to church on Saturday, and that I am a reprobate sinner for going to church on Sunday, that I address here. Those who insist that if I would only go to church on Saturday and stop eating pork, I too could earn Celestial Brownie Points and one day, I might even attain to the higher ground on which they stand.

I could care less who goes to church on what day, or what they eat…